Analyst: Uniswap transactions in August, 140 million more than the Cboe
See alsoAccording to ARK Invest crypto analyst Lorenzo Valente, Uniswap completed about 140 million transactions in August, exceeding the total number of Cboe BZX and NYSE American deals combined. The data comes from PANews reporting on September 25, suggesting that on-chain trading frequency is up but statistical caliber still needs to be distinguished from amount; for readers this reflects more deal activity than asset value or return on investment.
The label Uniswap : DeFi ARK Investments is the on-chain exchange of United States exchanges.
Characteristics of the mapAbstract tech-finance style, blue on-chain nodes intertwined with a securities trading curve, no person, no trademark and no price.
The on-chain Agreement is close to the United States in terms of trading volume
PANews September 25, ARK Invest crypto analyst Lorenzo Valente said that Uniswap completed about 140 million transactions in August this year, more than the total number of transactions between Cboe BZX and NYSE American. The comparison is noteworthy because it puts an on-chain protocol with mature securities exchanges under the same set of frequency indices observed:
For the reader, the core message is not that some product has beaten a traditional market bubble, but rather that crypto infrastructure is forming with quantifiable activity. Transaction volumes can reflect network usage intensity, but it's not the same thing as transaction volume, market depth, compliance level and asset value. Putting around 140 million pennies together with centennial exchanges makes it easier to help outsiders understand the sense of scale in an DeFi trading ecosystem than to make direct price judgments.
From 2 million to 140 million: Changes in activity need calibration
Lorenzo Valente also mentions that Uniswap had a monthly transaction volume of about 2 million five years ago. From approximately 2 million to around 140 million in August this year, the number varies considerably. Such growth may be due to more frequent interaction with on-chain , continued operation of automated market mechanisms and increased demand for exchanges on token , which could also relate to overall network activity. In other words, monthly transactions are more like using a frequency metric rather than an income or asset size indicator.
The analyst also points out that the upper tier is currently NYSE Arca, which traded about 232 million in August. This provides readers with a reference coordinate: Uniswap has crossed Cboe BZX's sum to NYSE American but there is still room for observation at around 232 millions of NYSE arcas. Subsequent questions are whether this frequency of on-chain can be sustained and if different statistical calibres can be explained more clearly.
Why Traditional Exchanges Can't Simply Be Equated With on-chain
Cboe BZX, NYSE American and NYSE Arca are both United States securities exchanges whose trading volume is typically associated with the execution of a security transaction, such as an order book marketplace. The Uniswap is the on-chain protocol, where user interactions take place through smart contract , and one trade may correspond to token swaps, liquidity operations or programmatic calls. There are differences in technical architecture, methods of participation, and statistical objects.
Therefore, this type of comparison is better understood as a quantitative benchmark rather than an analogue calibration. When the reader sees that it exceeds the sum of two exchanges' combined values, he needs to simultaneously pay attention to how they are calculated: on-chain transaction volumes may contain large amounts of small or automated interactions, while traditional exchange trading volumes are influenced by securities trading rules, execution methods and market structure.
What does this add up to for crypto readers?
For crypto readers, the incremental value of this information lies in three things: firstly, ARK Invest's crypto analyst Lorenzo Valente states that institutional research is using traditional capital market indicators to observe DeFi deals and on-chain data are starting to enter a more mainstream comparison framework; secondly, PANews provides retrospective facts on the timing, transaction volumes and names of institutions in its September 25th news release: about 140 million pips in August this year, about 2 million five years ago, NYSE Arca around 232 million; thirdly, it reminds readers that when looking at the growth of DeFi , one should distinguish between how frequently bitcoin trades were made and what amount was exchanged for gold.
What is worth continuing to watch in the future is not whether a single number continues to rise, but how on-chain 's system of indicators between agreements and traditional trading venues will be more accurately demarcated. The fact that some 140 million transactions were completed by Uniswap in August suggests that activity has reached levels that can be discussed by mainstream financial narratives; however, it still needs more public data and verifiable calibers to answer if it translates into longer-term changes in market structure.
Warning signs
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. crypto asset Prices fluctuate widely, the frequency of transactions in on-chain does not equal asset value or earnings, readers should independently verify information and make a rational judgment.

评论